Wednesday, 7 September 2016

GUEST POST – Fixing UK Land Power

A guest post from ‘Monty’ This article is intended to be a high-level discussion of the issues and potential fixes that would address the manifold problems faced by the British Army. It isn’t a deep-dive supported by detailed budgeting, planning and implementation considerations. So I trust readers will judge it for what it is rather ...

The post GUEST POST – Fixing UK Land Power appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/guest-post-fixing-uk-land-power/

Tuesday, 6 September 2016

Collection: UK armed forces equipment and formations

This publication provides annual statistics at 1 April each year on the UK armed forces vessels, land equipment and aircraft, and military formations. Also provided are statistics on the numbers of militarily useful, British registered vessels. Upcoming release dates for this publication are available here. from Ministry of Defence – Activity on GOV.UK http://ift.tt/2c7lGHv

The post Collection: UK armed forces equipment and formations appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/collection-uk-armed-forces-equipment-formations/

Case study: ASV Global delivers key surface vessel for MOD maritime programme

ASV Global is a small business based in Portchester, Hampshire with 60 employees specialising in the design and build of unmanned and autonomous marine systems. ASV Global is responsible for the Unmanned Surface Vessel including Retractable Sonar within the Maritime Mine Counter Measures (MMCM) demonstrator project. The MMCM project is a collaborative procurement between the ...

The post Case study: ASV Global delivers key surface vessel for MOD maritime programme appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/case-study-asv-global-delivers-key-surface-vessel-mod-maritime-programme/

Royal Marines Stonehouse barracks gets the axe

The MoD has just announced another piece of the family silver is to be sold off. The oldest barracks in England, RM Stonehouse, ‘spiritual home to Royal Marines’ since 1756 is to be put up for sale.

Around 750 people are based at the barracks which is home to the headquarters of 3 Commando Brigade and other units including 30 Commando IX Group and Commander United Kingdom Task Group (COMUKTG). The site is old, grand and holds historic value and artefacts. Maintaining the site is more costly than a purpose-built modern alternative but it is perfectly fit for purpose and its imposing facade is keeping with the Royal Marines more than 350 years of outstanding service to the nation.

The MoD is in the midst of its Orwellian sounding “Estate Optimisation Strategy programme” which of course just another round of closures. It has the laudable aim to reduce waste in the defence estate where there is over-capacity of inefficient use of facilities. There is a temptation to have a knee-jerk response against any reductions but in many cases the plans are sensible and either the sites are entirely surplus of the work can be done eleswhere.

Stonehouse’s demise has been rumoured since before the SDSR but as the marines emerged unscathed in October 2015 this possibility was overlooked for a time. Just one of 13 sites on the newly released list of closures it is clearly the odd one out. The other sites all belong to the Army or RAF, both of which have suffered significant cuts and continue to reduce in strength. However one of the many good decisions of the 2015 SDSR was not to cut the strength of the Royal Marines. 3 Commando Brigade headquartered at Stonehouse and arguably Britain’s single most potent fighting formation is to remain in tact.

Government has quite reasonably has justified yet further reduction in the defence estate as an opportunity to release brown-field sites for badly needed new housing. Plymouth estate agents are already salivating at the prospect of another luxury flat development close to the waterfront. Only time will tell if the redevelopment of Stonehouse benefits the whole city or just and affluent minority.

Although local MPs may see it that way, it is ultimately not the job of the MoD to prop up the Plymouth economy or subsidise the preservation of historic buildings. However there is a bigger picture to consider. The building and surroundings that a military unit inhabits impacts its ethos, imparting a sense of history, pride and self confidence. It would be quite possible to dump the Royal Marines in cheap bog-standard modern buildings on some industrial estate but something significant would be lost. There is also the need for resilience and spare capacity. Stonehouse may have some excess space but that is exactly what might be needed in time of war when extra accommodation is required for units in transit, to house expanding units or recalled reserves.

The creeping peacetime-only mentality that is entirely driven by accountancy undermines the credibility of our whole defence. The bare-minimum, most financially efficient facilities will be totally inadequate in emergencies.

As a city distanced from the UK’s main economic powerhouses, Plymouth has relied heavily on the income from hosting naval forces over the centuries. But it is a two-way relationship, the people of Plymouth have supported the navy and marines in peacetime and shared their hardships in wartime. This closure is another blow to the city and The MoD should consider the impact that closures have on local communities that are deeply entwined with the military on their doorstep. The size of the defence estate across Britain has been in decline for the last 40 years but no where is it more noticeable than in Plymouth. In the square mile adjacent to RM Stonehouse, the Royal William Yard closed (1992), the Naval Hospital RNH Stonehouse closed, (1995), Mount Wise Naval HQ (Closed 2004), and large chunks of Devonport South Yard have been sold off and are being redeveloped. (Not far away the gunners of 29 Cdo have managed to keep their their base in the Hoe Citadel but, it too is under threat of closure). Shutting these facilities makes some sense (only if we accept that a much reduced navy make sense) and these prime sites have been redeveloped to the great benefit of many. However the end of Stonehouse is one closure too many and cannot be properly justified when the Royal Marines are not reducing in numbers.

It is not immediately obvious where the 750 Marines and supporting staff will be relocated. There has been some recent investment in a the new base at RM Tamar at the north end of Devonport Naval Base, now home to the 300 personnel and boats of 1 Assault Group. Whether there is space to expand RM Tamar as a new HQ seems unlikely although there is probably enough vacant space for a new facility elsewhere within the naval base which is now somewhat under utilised. Other local sites that have the potential for a new HQ would be HMS Raleigh, RM Bickleigh or the Hoe Citadel, either way if HQ 3 Cdo Brigade is to remain in the Plymouth area then it will probably require investment in new buildings to house them.  Alternatively they could be relocated away from Plymouth to RM Chivenor (North Devon), RM Lympstone (South Devon), or even a defunct Army barracks in another part of the country.

Main image: Medals Parade, RM Stonehouse, 2009 Rob Gillies via Flickr

 

 



from Save the Royal Navy http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/royal-marines-stonehouse-barracks-gets-the-axe/

FOI release: FOI responses published by MOD: week commencing 29 August 2016

Ministry of Defence (MOD) Freedom of Information (FOI) responses published during the week commencing 29 August 2016 Request for information on architects report on staircase conducted on 11 February 2016 Ref: DIO FOI 2016/05705PDF, 95.4KB No Information held by MOD on asbestos in departmental buildings Ref: DIO FOI 2016/04907PDF, 90.5KB Contractual payment schedule of the ...

The post FOI release: FOI responses published by MOD: week commencing 29 August 2016 appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/foi-release-foi-responses-published-mod-week-commencing-29-august-2016/

43906 – Military Attaches (Answered)

Mr Kevan Jones To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what his Department’s planned expenditure is on UK defence attachés in each year to 2020. Mike Penning The following information shows Ministry of Defence funding for the Defence Attaché and Advisor Network to financial year (FY) 2019-20 including costs associated with the British Defence ...

The post 43906 – Military Attaches (Answered) appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/43906-military-attaches-answered/

43907 – Ministry of Defence: Languages (Answered)

Mr Kevan Jones To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what his Department’s planned expenditure is on language training in each year to 2020. Mark Lancaster The following table highlights the projected expenditure by financial year (FY), for the delivery of language training by the Defence Academy (DA) (part of Joint Force Command) and ...

The post 43907 – Ministry of Defence: Languages (Answered) appeared first on Think Defence.



from Think Defence http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2016/09/43907-ministry-defence-languages-answered/